中華工程（2515）股權爭議風波擴大！針對近期公司股權變動異常及股價劇烈波動，中工為維護股東權益，2月24日大動作宣布已正式委請律師向檢調單位遞狀，對長龍、聯洲、全通等三家委託書通路業者，以及鉅業國際法律事務所林文鵬律師等人，提出涉嫌內線交易及操縱股價的刑事告發。
中工痛批昔日合作夥伴「左手領顧問費、右手搞內線」，並質疑幕後有黑手透過異常連號的帳戶操縱股價，強調為捍衛16萬名股東權益絕對「零容忍」。中工針對此事發表四點嚴正聲明，完整內容如下：
一、嚴守商業誠信，質疑昔日受任團隊違反職業倫理與背信
長龍、聯洲、全通等公司長期受本公司委任擔任股東會顧問，雙方具備明確顧問契約關係。根據寶佳集團公告，其早於 114 年 4 月即開始買進中工股票；本公司合理懷疑，上述通路業者在「合約存續且領有顧問費期間」，即已利用職務之便知悉內幕消息並私下佈局。
隨後，上述業者在 114 年 10 月 27 日寶佳集團改採鉅額買進、股價起漲之同一時間點，突然通知要終止長期委任關係；更令人震驚的是，根據事證顯示，其相關人員在 114 年 11 月 4 日重大消息公開前，已集體先行買進本公司股票。本公司強烈籲請檢調回溯徹查其帳戶交易明細 ，以釐清其違法買股套利行為是否早於雙方委任期間即已發生。此等「左手領顧問費、右手搞內線」之行徑，已嚴重違背商業倫理與受託義務。
此外，本次告發對象中的林文鵬律師，不僅擔任寶佳集團關聯企業（寶晶能源）之獨立董事，具備準內部人身分；過去更曾與其所屬之鉅業國際法律事務所，受任協助本公司關聯之中石化處理經營權防禦，並於 2011 至 2025 年間，擔任中石化法律顧問。豈料，如今不僅站在對立面協助寶佳集團，更在敏感時刻，從「零持股」 狂買數百萬股中工股票。本公司嚴正質疑，林律師是否利用這層 「昔日長期受任服務中石化」 的特殊信任關係，掌握內部資訊，進而進行與職務顯有利益衝突之個人交易？此種行徑恐已跨越律師職業倫理與法律紅線。
二、相近期間股東戶號異常連號，連續大量買進，強烈懷疑幕後黑手涉嫌操縱股價
值得深究的是，經本公司比對股東名冊，發現包含三大通路商高層、寶佳關係人(含有申報及未申報)等在內之「新增股東群」，其股東戶號呈現高度密集的 「連續連號」 或落於相近區間。實務上，不同法人與自然人要在同一期間取得如此相近甚至連續的股東戶號，機率微乎其微。因此本公司合理懷疑，這些帳戶極有可能是在背後「黑手」指點下，因「連續在相近時間建檔開戶」才會呈現股東戶號高度密集的連續連號現象，便於幕後黑手進行「多帳戶聯通作業」，透過單一窗口集中控管，以錯開市場關注、規避單一帳戶大量買進之監控。
本公司進一步質疑，幕後黑手刻意安排三大通路商利用這些新戶頭買股，其用意是否企圖透過 「相對成交、相互對做」 的手法製造交易活絡之假象，進而操縱股價？而這些通路商在股價飆漲中所獲取的龐大不法利益， 是否即為幕後黑手用以支付其協助 「收購委託書」 的實質報酬？為此 ，本公司正式籲請包括臺灣證交所、金管會、集保中心、檢調單位等主管機關，深入調閱相關券商開戶資料、銀行帳號及金流，並徹查其是否有相對成交等構成違反證券交易法之「操縱股價」 客觀要件。
此外 ，針對是否有其他外圍人士亦於同時期加入異常開戶與購股之行列 ，涉嫌操縱股價及內線交易，本公司目前正全面清查比對股東名冊。 待相關金流與戶號回溯等證據整理完備後， 將視證據收集進度， 不排除對相關涉案人員提起第二波提告，絕不寬貸。
三、股價與成交量異常波動，涉嫌獲取巨大非法利益，籲請主管機關徹查
根據證交所公開數據，本公司股價於寶佳集團公告收購併購前後之區間（114 年10 月 27 日至 11 月 10 日），出現背離市場常態之劇烈波動， 收盤價漲幅達 55.16%。其中 10 月 29 日單日成交量更急遽放大至平日之 13.31 倍，期間更連續遭證交所列為注意及處置股票。本公司有合理事證懷疑， 特定人等透過連續高價買入或其他交易手段， 意圖影響本公司股價，涉嫌達成特定併購目的或從中獲取巨大非法利益。 此等行為嚴重干擾證券市場之自由運作機制， 損害廣大投資人權益。 11 月10 日之後的異常成交量將另行提出告訴。
四、堅持公司治理，捍衛 16 萬名股東權益
中工向來恪守公司治理原則，歡迎所有合法、透明的投資行為，但絕不容忍任何遊走法律邊緣、 破壞市場秩序之手段。對於掌握通路之三大委託書通路商疑似利用資訊優勢套利之行為，本公司均採取零容忍態度。本次採取法律行動，旨在維護市場法紀與捍衛全體股東權益，並呼籲檢調單位深入調查相關資金流向與通聯紀錄，勿枉勿縱，以維護台灣資本市場之廉潔與公正。本公司經營團隊將持續專注本業經營，確保公司長遠發展與全體股東之最大利益。
股價異常圖。
量能失控：籌碼異常軌跡。
0持股變大戶對照表。
Taiwan’s BES files criminal complaint over alleged insider trading
Company names counsel to PJ Group and proxy solicitation firms
BES Engineering Corp. accuses attorney Lin Wen-peng and three proxy firms of alleged insider trading and stock manipulation. (BES photo)
BES Engineering Corp. (中華工程) filed a criminal complaint accusing attorney Lin Wen-peng (林文鵬) and three proxy solicitation firms of alleged insider trading and stock price manipulation following unusual share movements ahead of a takeover move on Tuesday.
The company said the complaint cites alleged violations of Article 157-1 of Taiwan’s Securities and Exchange Act (證券交易法), which prohibits insider trading, and Article 155, which addresses market manipulation.
BES identified Lin, a lawyer at Giant Era International Law Office (鉅業國際法律事務所), as a key subject of the filing.
Giant Era International Law Office is currently acting as legal counsel for PJ Group (寶佳集團) in the ongoing contest for control of BES. Lin also serves as an independent director of INA Energy (寶晶能源), an affiliate of PJ Group, and previously provided legal services to China Petrochemical Development Corp. (中石化), a BES-related company.
According to BES, Lin purchased several million BES shares before Nov. 4, when PJ Group formally disclosed its stake in BES and stated that the share purchases were for acquisition purposes. The company stated that Lin had not previously held shares and strongly suspects that the trades involved the use of non-public information and conflicts of interest, and has asked prosecutors to investigate the matter.
BES also named three proxy solicitation firms — Chang Lung Meeting Consultancy Co. (長龍), Lien Cheng Conference Consulting Co. (聯洲) and Chuan Tung Shareholder Service Co. (全通) — all of which had previously served as shareholder meeting consultants to the company.
According to market reports, PJ Group entered into arrangements with the three proxy solicitation firms in an effort to consolidate retail shareholder votes.
Against this backdrop, BES said it suspects that the firms may have obtained material non-public information through their service roles and accumulated BES shares while they were still under contract and receiving advisory fees. BES has asked authorities to review transaction records to determine whether improper gains were made.
Separately, BES said it identified newly opened shareholder accounts with sequential or closely numbered account identifiers during the same period. Such patterns may indicate coordinated account openings, the company said, and could warrant further review of trading activity, including possible cross trades or other forms of manipulation.
BES urged regulators, including the Taiwan Stock Exchange and the Financial Supervisory Commission, to examine brokerage data and fund flows. BES also cited that between Oct. 27 and Nov. 10, BES shares gained 55.16%. Trading volume on Oct. 29 was more than 13 times the daily average, and the stock was flagged repeatedly for unusual activity.
BES said it is continuing to review shareholder records and may file additional complaints if further evidence is identified. The company said it remains focused on corporate governance and protecting shareholder interests.
